S T; Ppd Mcmillan — Pulaski County Officer Records (2025)
What happened in 70 cases involving this officer
Of 70 cases involving S T; Ppd Mcmillan, 14 reached a final disposition in this court — fewer than the 20 our methodology requires before publishing an outcome rate, so none is shown.
Ask a Pulaski County attorney — freeWhat were you charged with?
See what happened in S T; Ppd Mcmillan's cases for your specific charge.
If S T; Ppd Mcmillan filed your case in Pulaski County, here's what the data shows: of 70 cases filed, 14 reached an outcome — 64.3% were dismissed and 35.7% resulted in conviction. That dismissal rate is notably above the statewide average of 40.6%. Statewide, this is higher than 89% of Virginia officers.
The most common charge in this officer's cases is Sex Offense (50 cases, 0.0% dismissed), followed by Fraud / Forgery (8 cases). What happens in your case depends on your specific charge, the facts, and the court — but this data gives you a starting point.
Based on 70 public court records, 2025. Cases heard at Pulaski County District Court. Dismissal rate includes cases dropped by the court or prosecutor. Conviction rate includes guilty pleas and trial verdicts. Last updated: August 24, 2026
January to June 2026 · read at June 30 · General District Court
7 cases naming S T; Ppd Mcmillan as the charging officer in Pulaski County were filed January to June 2026, and 1 had resolved by June 30.
Fewer than 20 of them had resolved by June 30, so no 2026 rate is published here yet. 6 were still open at June 30. The same read of January to June 2025 is beside it, so the two half-years are compared at the same age.
| Measure | Jan–Jun 2026 | Jan–Jun 2025, same read |
|---|---|---|
| Filed | 7 | 62 |
| Resolved by June 30 | 1 | 3 |
| Still open at June 30 | 6 | 59 |
| Dismissed or dropped, of resolved | n/a | n/a |
| Convicted, of resolved | n/a | n/a |
| Convicted on a reduced charge, of resolved | n/a | n/a |
A case counts as resolved only if its final hearing was held on or before June 30 of its filing year; rates divide by those cases. General District Court only — 2026 Circuit Court figures are not yet published (feed paused 2026-07-09). Filed counts carry a recording caveat and no year-over-year change is claimed. Source read 2026-09-14; the 2025 benchmark elsewhere on this page is the full calendar year. Method.
Cases by Charge Type
| Charge | Cases | Dismissal Rate |
|---|---|---|
| Sex Offense Guide | 50 | 0.0% |
| Fraud / Forgery Guide | 8 | 83.3% |
| Other | 5 | 20.0% |
Other Officers in Pulaski County
| Officer | Cases | Dismissal Rate |
|---|---|---|
| M R; Vsp Overholt | 988 | 13.3% |
| M A; Vsp Dunford | 703 | 7.2% |
| C C; Vsp Mcglothlin | 702 | 8.7% |
| B L; Vsp Boyette | 574 | 12.5% |
| S T; Vsp Golden | 514 | 4.3% |
Common Questions
Statistics from public court records for informational purposes only. Not legal advice. Officer statistics reflect case outcomes, not performance. Past outcomes do not predict future results.
Read this before you quote a number
What this record cannot show
This page is built from what court clerks recorded in cases that name S T; Ppd Mcmillan as the charging officer in Pulaski County. Some of what you may want to know is not in that record.
- The officer’s conduct. A dismissal is not a finding about the officer. Cases end because a witness does not appear, evidence is challenged, a plea is reached on another charge, or the prosecutor chooses not to proceed. The record shows the outcome, not the reason.
- Who else worked the case. Each case names one charging officer. Partners, supervisors, and other officers involved are not recorded, and neither is the agency’s own account of the arrest.
- Complaints, discipline, or body-camera footage. None of that is in court records. This page is case outcomes only.
- Whether two names are one person. Officer names are matched within Pulaski County as the clerk entered them. Two officers who share a name in the same court can be combined, and one officer entered two ways can be split. Report either and we will check.
- The judge and the prosecutor. Virginia’s court records do not carry the judge’s name, and they name the prosecutor’s office rather than the individual prosecutor.
- Cases still open. Rates here count only the 14 cases that reached a dismissal, plea, verdict, or acquittal. The other 56 cases filed in 2025 were still pending or otherwise unresolved when the record was read, and they are in none of the rates.
- Cases filed before 2025. This page covers cases filed in 2025. A case filed in 2024 and decided in 2025 is not here.
- Whether the person charged had a lawyer. The court’s counsel field is not reliable enough to publish, so this page does not say who was represented, or whether counsel was hired or appointed.
- Guilty plea or trial in General District Court. District court records do not say whether a conviction came by plea or after a trial. Only Circuit Court records do, so no plea or trial rate appears here.
- What the 2026 half-year can show. The January to June 2026 figures are read at June 30 and count a case as resolved only if its final hearing was held by that date; 6 of 7 were still open. No year-over-year change is claimed from them.
Every figure on this page comes from Virginia’s public court records as read on August 24, 2026. Coverage notes and definitions are in the methodology. If something here is wrong, tell us and we will check the record.
Data source: Virginia public court records, 2025. 70 cases analyzed. Last updated August 24, 2026. See the 2025 Virginia Criminal Court Outcomes report for statewide context. — VirginiaCourtFile.com
What's Next
64.3% of this officer's cases in Pulaski County are dismissed. A defense attorney who knows this court can review your case — free, no obligation.