Officers in Pulaski County
Case outcome statistics for 79 officers from 2025 public court records
These statistics reflect case outcomes where the officer appears as the complainant or arresting officer. Dismissal rates are influenced by charge type, jurisdiction practices, and other factors beyond the officer. Methodology.
| Officer | Cases | Dismissal rate | Conviction rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| M R; Vsp Overholt | 988 | 13.2% | 86.5% |
| M A; Vsp Dunford | 703 | 7.2% | 92.2% |
| C C; Vsp Mcglothlin | 702 | 8.2% | 90.2% |
| B L; Vsp Boyette | 574 | 12.5% | 87.5% |
| S T; Vsp Golden | 514 | 4.4% | 95.3% |
| D L; Vsp Vaughn | 478 | 6.6% | 93.1% |
| J Stone | 337 | 12.0% | 88.0% |
| B R; Pcso Owens | 305 | 16.8% | 83.2% |
| J W; Ppd Stone | 290 | 18.6% | 80.8% |
| B L; Aco Reed | 283 | 44.2% | 55.1% |
| R E; Vsp Reynolds | 250 | 19.0% | 80.4% |
| C W; Vsp Martin | 247 | 11.0% | 87.1% |
| A M; Pcso Guzman | 243 | 12.4% | 87.0% |
| A; Pcso Sealander | 177 | 10.9% | 89.1% |
| C T; Vsp Viars | 171 | 13.7% | 86.3% |
| J; Ppd Miner | 161 | 16.0% | 82.0% |
| B; Pcso Baker | 158 | 21.1% | 78.9% |
| J; Ppd Stone | 147 | 10.3% | 88.5% |
| A J; Ppd Minnick | 138 | 14.0% | 82.6% |
| O J; Vsp Lilly | 128 | 2.9% | 97.1% |
| J; Pcso Turpin | 119 | 23.1% | 76.9% |
| M T; Dpd Bruce | 113 | 19.6% | 78.6% |
| L N; Ppd Tabor | 111 | 41.3% | 58.7% |
| R M; Dpd Gravely | 110 | 21.1% | 78.9% |
| R W; Pcso Bowden | 99 | 13.3% | 86.7% |
| H V; Ppd Phipps | 96 | 31.2% | 64.1% |
| G A; Dpd Martin | 92 | 16.7% | 83.3% |
| R; Pcso Ellis | 90 | 57.1% | 42.9% |
| E S; Ppd Saunders | 89 | 35.6% | 64.4% |
| C D; Pcso Freeman | 76 | 25.0% | 75.0% |
| J M; Vsp Boone | 74 | 16.7% | 83.3% |
| L; Pcso Taylor | 74 | 31.2% | 68.8% |
| H B; Pcso Jones | 73 | 36.0% | 64.0% |
| M; Ppd Vallejo | 72 | 10.2% | 89.8% |
| S T; Ppd Mcmillan | 70 | 64.3% | 35.7% |
| B K; Pcso Rochelle | 68 | 23.5% | 76.5% |
| G S; Vsp Barnett | 67 | 4.2% | 95.8% |
| J S; Pcso Nieman | 63 | 10.5% | 89.5% |
| K J; Pcso Hodge | 61 | 19.4% | 80.6% |
| P A; Ppd Linkous | 58 | 38.0% | 60.0% |
| Bryan Hinkle | 51 | 13.0% | 87.0% |
| J N; Ppd Lucas | 51 | 37.1% | 62.9% |
| T P; Ppd Croteau | 51 | 30.3% | 66.7% |
| A T; Pcso Williams | 50 | 45.5% | 54.5% |
| Rtpr Tp; Vsp Atkins | 48 | 5.3% | 94.7% |
| C J; Ppd Dickerson | 47 | 9.7% | 90.3% |
| D C; Ppd Stephens | 47 | 31.2% | 68.8% |
| T G; Dpd Martin | 47 | 20.0% | 80.0% |
| F M; Pcso Medina | 46 | 3.1% | 96.9% |
| R L; Pcso Taylor | 44 | 38.5% | 19.2% |
| D; Pcso Alley | 40 | 34.6% | 65.4% |
| E J; Pcso Hodge | 39 | 19.2% | 76.9% |
| S; Ppd Nash | 39 | 7.7% | 92.3% |
| Roy Bowden | 38 | 43.5% | 56.5% |
| D E; Pcso Farmer | 37 | 31.2% | 68.8% |
| A; Gdif Rohrer | 34 | 54.5% | 45.5% |
| Vasap | 33 | 82.1% | 17.9% |
| A J; Pcso Doney | 31 | 31.8% | 68.2% |
| M L; Ppd Rudisill | 31 | 16.7% | 83.3% |
| Z P; Pcso Handy | 31 | 13.0% | 87.0% |
| D S; Dpd Mitchell | 30 | 9.5% | 90.5% |
| Rtpr Tp Atkins | 30 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| T M; Vsp Smith | 30 | 73.3% | 26.7% |
| J M; Pcso Vaught | 27 | 46.2% | 53.8% |
| T P; Vsp Atkins | 27 | 12.5% | 87.5% |
| W; Ppd Kelly | 27 | 31.6% | 68.4% |
| J L; Ppd Williamson | 26 | 52.4% | 47.6% |
| E S; Pcso Medina | 25 | 25.0% | 75.0% |
| J K; Pcso Golden | 25 | 53.3% | 46.7% |
| R W; Dgif Wood | 25 | 37.5% | 62.5% |
| E C; Dpd Akers | 24 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| M Rudisill | 24 | 20.0% | 80.0% |
| Matthew Melton | 24 | 8.7% | 91.3% |
| A J; Ppd Doney | 23 | 5.6% | 94.4% |
| B L; Pcso Hurley | 22 | 22.7% | 77.3% |
| G T; Pcso Rich | 22 | 18.2% | 81.8% |
| Trp Lt; Vsp Harmon | 22 | 7.7% | 92.3% |
| T B; Ppd Cox | 21 | 12.5% | 87.5% |
| Kenton Whitteker | 20 | 63.2% | 36.8% |
Pulaski County District Court overview · All Virginia officers